2005-03-05

Mutuelles d'assurance


Il y a quelques jours, je soulignais la question des profits des compagnies privées d'assurance. Il me semble que l'ensemble du domaine financier (banques, fonds d'investissement et assurances) doit être prioritaire dans toute réflexion sur la démocratie économique.

Je me demande à quel point le domaine des mutuelles d'assurance est une piste de solution. Il y a une association internationale des mutuelles. Voir également l'association américaine et l'Association canadienne des compagnies d'assurance mutuelles. Au Québec, les mutuelles sont (presque) toutes organisées autour du groupe Promutuel.

Mais je dois avouer mon ignorance sur un point en particulier. Quelle est la différence entre une compagnie mutuelle et une coopérative? C'est une question dont je ne trouve pas de réponse satisfaisante. Quelqu'un pourrait m'éclairer?






COMMENTAIRES

What answers I do have at the moment will probably be just as dissatisfying as the answers already received from the various associations. Here in the states I'm not sure there is such an animal as a "cooperative" insurance company, at least I've never read an insurance organization law that mentioned them. Mutual companies tend to have self-perpetuating boards controlled by management.

There are companies that are owned by their agents (LifeUSA comes to mind) and no doubt there are stock companies owned by their employees.

I think the closest to the ideal of a cooperative insurance company that state insurance laws allow is that of fraternal insurers. They are regarded as passe these days...but a little marketing dare-and-do....and a mass social movement and common social bonds placed in the mix...and...voila!

I've threatened to start or take over a fraternal a time or two...not within anyone's earshot though.

One possibility for forming a cooperative insurance company would be to form a holding company that is an employee-owned cooperative. In several states companies can form Mondragon-style "internal capital account cooperatives." But such an arrangement would not really fit the definition of a consumer cooperative operating as an insurer. Perhaps a consumer cooperative could itself form such a holding company.

Any other possibilities?

Par Alan Avans le 2005-03-05 14:48

As far as I know, the Mutuals here in North America were started by farmers back in the 1830's. They were run along coop lines. But since then they have degenerated, as Alan mentions. The French Mutual Movement however, still is run along coop lines, as far as I can see, and came about as a result of the labor movement. See: http://www.mutualite.fr/web/frameset.nsf/home

Par Larry Gambone le 2005-03-05 23:45



AJOUTER UN COMMENTAIRE:
Nom:


Courriel:


URL:


Commentaire:


Retranscrivez ces chiffres s.v.p. :


Conserver les informations?