| dim | lun | mar | mer | jeu | ven | sam |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Have a look the different criterias for screening (gambling, human rights, community investment, ...) portfolios that may be recognised as ethical and responsible. By the Social Investment Forum.
It would be better if the criteria also included matters that were pertinent to economic democracy such as "support for producer or consumer coops". As it is most of the criteria are rather moralistic and do little to advance society in a more libertarian direction.
Par Pat Murtagh le 2005-05-21 22:30I agree. It is interesting to see that most criteria are "nagative" : do not invest in this kind of company, or this kind...
We do need more positive, foreward-looking criterias. And Pat is right : efforts toward economic democracy should be such a criteria.
Par Pierre Ducasse le 2005-05-30 09:44