2006-04-26

Debating Economic Alternatives to Capitalism: Parecon vs. EconDem


Many advocates of economic justice have long believed that capitalism needs to be transcended. However, positive programs for a just economy have been lacking compared to the hailstorm of anti-capitalist critiques that the left has produced. This shortage of vision has resulted in activists lacking a common praxis and prevents them from connecting with potential sympathizers. In an attempt to remedy this problem, two schools of thought have developed visions for a post-capitalist economy: market socialism and what may be called democratic-participatory economics.

The present post concerns a debate between two visions of an alternative economic system to capitalism:

- Participatory Economics or Parecon advocated by Michael Albert
- Economic Democracy* (*SEE NOTE BELOW) or EconDem advocated by David Schweickart

Parecon is a proposed economic system that uses participatory decision making as an economic mechanism to guide the allocation of resources and consumption in a given society. Proposed as an alternative to contemporary capitalist market economies and also an alternative to centrally planned “socialism” or coordinatorism. The underlying values that parecon seeks to implement are equity, solidarity, diversity, and participatory self-management. It proposes to attain these ends mainly through the following principles and institutions:
workers' and consumers' councils utilizing self-managerial methods for decision making,
balanced job complexes,
remuneration according to effort and sacrifice, and
participatory planning.
For a deeper understanding here is the whole online version of the book: Participatory Economics: Life After Capitalism.

Schweickart’s EconDem is a proposed form of market socialism that embodies three key ideas:
Democratic management of each productive enterprise by the workers
Democratic management of capital investment by a form of public banking
A (mostrly free) market for goods, raw materials, instruments of production, etc.
The firms and factories are owned by society and managed by the workers. These enterprises, so managed, compete in markets to sell their goods. Profit is shared by the workers. Each enterprise is taxed for the capital they employ, and that tax is distributed to public banks, who fund expansion of existing as well as new industries.
For a deeper understanding see the book: After Capitalism by David Schweickart.

Albert and Schweickart do not agree on each others proposed economic model. The heated debate that follows focuses mostly on Parecon (see poursuivre la lecture) and raises many important issues for Economic Democrats to think about, discuss, debate and eventually act on whether one advocates either model, rejects both or likes features of each...

A Comparison between Schweickart’s EconDem and Parecon

Michael Albert’s Parecon: Nonsense on Stilts by David Schweickart

Critique Without Comprehension: Responding to David Schweickart Regarding Parecon by Michael Albert

I Still Think It's Nonsense A Reply to Albert’s Reply by David Schweickart

Still Uncomprehending…Reply to the Reply to the Review of the Book Parecon by Michael Albert

PLEASE NOTE:

*ECODEMA’s Economic Democracy is not necessarily the vision promoted by Schweickart. ECODEMA uses the term Economic Democracy in a more generic way to advocate a democratized economy in which communities and workers participate in decisions regarding production, consumption and investment. ECODEMA’s Economic Democracy or Democratic Economics is a declaration of a principle (and not necessarily a particular model); that principle being that people should have power over their collective economic destiny much in the same way that they should have power over their political destiny (political democracy). ECODEMA prefers aspects of participatory democracy rather than just purely representative democracy. ECODEMA seeks real world examples of Democratic Economics and examines proposals such as those cited above without necessarily advocating a particular model. Schweickart has called his attempt of seeking to democratize the economy as Economic Democracy but not all who believe in Democratic Economics would advocate the Schweickart Model. Hence, Parecon also belongs to the larger Economic Democracy family. Therefore in order not to confuse readers between the generic use of the term Economic Democracy and the name of the Schweickart Model, we have used the expression Schweickart’s EconDem for the latter.






COMMENTAIRES


AJOUTER UN COMMENTAIRE:
Nom:


Courriel:


URL:


Commentaire:


Retranscrivez ces chiffres s.v.p. :


Conserver les informations?